Rants And Ramblings About Mobile Technology
Anders Borg writing about the fun and crazy world of mobile and Internet service technologies.
You can also read the blog via Twitter or your phone via wap.abiro.com. See the left menu for more news.
Comments on blog entries are moderated, but I'm rather liberal as long as it's not blatant advertising.
For general comments, advertising and contribution queries, please use the feedback form.
Saturday, December 09, 2006
IBM dominates CPUs for game consoles
A side track (way out there):
I read in Wikipedia that IBM has delivered the CPUs to Nintendo Wii, Sony Playstation 3 and Microsoft Xbox 360. In other words, all the leading new game consoles.
Interestingly each CPU has different specs. It shows IBM is flexible in terms of designing chips for specific customer needs.
Also interesting is that the Cell CPU used in PlayStation 3 is actually based on existing building blocks, depite being an unorthodox design (1 main CPU and 8 co-processors on the same chip).
I'm surprised Intel and AMD are not found here. Can't they make powerful enough chips? Are they too expensive? Too inflexible? Too PC-focused? Are their chips too power-consuming?
Apple is now using CPUs from Intel instead of from IBM, but providing CPUs to game consoles is probably a very lucrative business for IBM.
Will each manufacturer of game consoles now blame IBM for providing inferior CPUs compared to the rivals? There's no one else to blame than IBM, and one of the manufacturers has the lemon.
I read in Wikipedia that IBM has delivered the CPUs to Nintendo Wii, Sony Playstation 3 and Microsoft Xbox 360. In other words, all the leading new game consoles.
Interestingly each CPU has different specs. It shows IBM is flexible in terms of designing chips for specific customer needs.
Also interesting is that the Cell CPU used in PlayStation 3 is actually based on existing building blocks, depite being an unorthodox design (1 main CPU and 8 co-processors on the same chip).
I'm surprised Intel and AMD are not found here. Can't they make powerful enough chips? Are they too expensive? Too inflexible? Too PC-focused? Are their chips too power-consuming?
Apple is now using CPUs from Intel instead of from IBM, but providing CPUs to game consoles is probably a very lucrative business for IBM.
Will each manufacturer of game consoles now blame IBM for providing inferior CPUs compared to the rivals? There's no one else to blame than IBM, and one of the manufacturers has the lemon.
